Ad hominem txhais tau tias "tawm tsam tus txiv neej," thiab hom kev poob siab no qee zaum hu ua lub npe hu lossis kev tawm tsam tus kheej. Hom kev poob siab no tshwm sim thaum ib tug neeg tawm tsam tus neeg es tsis txhob tawm tsam nws qhov kev sib cav.
Dab tsi yog kev dag ntawm kev tawm tsam hominem?
(Tshem tus neeg): Qhov kev poob siab no tshwm sim thaum, tsis txhob hais ib tus neeg qhov kev sib cav lossis txoj haujlwm, koj tsis cuam tshuam tus neeg lossis qee yam ntawm tus neeg sib cav. Qhov kev tawm tsam tsis zoo kuj tseem tuaj yeem ncaj qha rau kev koom ua tswv cuab hauv ib pab pawg lossis chaw haujlwm.
Yuav ua li cas piv txwv ntawm ib qho ad hominem fallacy?
Ib qho piv txwv classic ntawm ad hominem fallacy yog muab hauv qab no: A: "Txhua tus neeg tua neeg yog neeg ua txhaum cai, tab sis tub sab tsis yog neeg tua neeg, thiab yog li tsis tuaj yeem ua txhaum cai." B: "Zoo, koj yog tub sab thiab tub sab, yog li ntawd muaj koj qhov kev sib cav."
Yuav ua li cas yog ad hominem tu quoque fallacy tshwm sim?
Tu Quoque fallacy yog ib daim ntawv ntawm ad hominem fallacy uas tsis tawm tsam ib tug neeg rau random, unrelated yam; xwb, nws yog tawm tsam rau ib tus neeg rau qhov kev lees paub qhov txhaum ntawm qhov lawv tau nthuav tawm lawv rooj plaub.
Yuav ua li cas yog ib qho ad hominem xwm txheej tsis txaus ntseeg?
The Ad Hominem - Circumstantial fallacy persuades by mimicking our legal concerns over conflict of interest. Txawm li cas los xij, kev sib cav tsis yog kev txiav txim siab. Ib tug neeg muaj kev tsis sib haum xeebtej zaum yuav yog vim li cas tsis zoo (thiab yog li txiav txim siab tsis zoo), tab sis nws qhov kev tsis sib haum xeeb ntawm kev txaus siab yuav tsum tsis cuam tshuam rau peb qhov kev ntsuam xyuas ntawm nws qhov kev sib cav.
